Landlord Scam Files

一些法律文件和录音

房东骗局标志

房东骗局:
法律程序与事件的文件化时间线

我十几岁来到台湾,并在那里度过了成年后大部分人生。我创办了学校,印制了自豪写着“台湾不是中国的一部分”的 T 恤,甚至几乎放弃加拿大护照,只为把台湾变成我永久的家。我把一切都投入其中——我的时间、积蓄与真心——都给了这片土地与这里的人们。

而随后发生的,是这一切生活的崩塌:一场租赁纠纷升级成了多年相互重叠的法律行动、密集的法律函件,以及远远超出任何理性人根据基本事实所能预期的后果。最终带来的,是事业被毁、长期压力、与我一同抚养的孩子分离——以及为了避免入狱而离开台湾,离开这个我至今仍视为家的地方。

本页是一个公开档案:这是一个按日期整理、以文件为基础的记录,供记者、法律观察者、人权倡议者以及任何希望直接审阅这条书面证据链的人参考。凡有解释性内容,均以基于下述文件与程序的个人观点方式呈现。

分隔图

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

杂项/未注明日期

关键证据——从这里开始

音频录音——台湾房东骗局案件

Ross Cline 动画图标 下列每一项都包含简短背景说明、可播放的音频文件,以及用于存档和透明公开的直接下载链接。

我之所以发布这些材料,是因为我仍然深深关心台湾,也因为我相信书面与音频记录本身很重要——尤其是在正式渠道几乎没有给出承认或纠正的情况下。

有一个片段很能体现这一经历的整体氛围:在一次高等法院的现场处理中,书记官要求我这个书面中文能力有限的外国人,手写填写我根本无法合理核对准确性的内容。无论这是冷漠还是更严重的问题,这都令人屈辱。像这样的事情,如果没有录音和文件,是很难传达清楚的。

这里公开的只是一部分记录。随着案卷继续发展,更多文件可能会以同样的档案形式陆续发布。

台湾台中地方法院——2023 年 8 月 14 日

这段录音记录了 2023 年 8 月 14 日在台中地方法院的一次庭审。

整场过程不断回到同一个问题:“你为什么要发布租赁合同,Cline 先生?”焦点始终集中在“发布”这件事本身,而不是围绕它的背景——包括促使我发布合同的涉嫌违约行为,以及我当时提出的安全顾虑。

在录音中,我解释了合同中的一项关键内容(包括卷动金属大门/安保问题)没有得到处理,以及在调解尝试失败后,我为何发布合同来记录这场纠纷。我也提到了一通据称来自房东丈夫的威胁电话,以及这一威胁如何被视为次要问题,而非与我的安全及当时心理状态密切相关的核心因素。

在我听来,这场庭审呈现出一种反复出现的模式:程序框架过于狭窄,对背景事实关注有限,而且显然不愿以外国被告能够真正理解并有效回应的方式来权衡相互冲突的证据。

这段音频可能听起来有些重复,但它恰恰反映了同一个问题是如何在多年里被反复提出——以及背景是如何一再被淡化的。

📥 下载音频(.m4a)

与律师的谈话——2023 年 9 月 28 日

这段录音记录了我与一位台湾律师在 2023 年 9 月 28 日进行的一次长谈。

我联系这位律师,是希望聘请私人律师独立审阅案卷。在谈话中,他说明了在案件已经涉及法律扶助的情况下,接手此案在实际与职业层面上存在的限制,并建议我寻求另一位法律扶助律师,而不是改由私人律师代理。

对我而言,这通电话体现了一个我反复遇到的结构性问题:即使我愿意付费寻求外部审查,通往真正有意义的独立法律协助的路径仍然显得非常有限且不确定。

重新听这段录音时,很明显我当时已极度疲惫,却仍在反复提出同一个最基本的请求:希望有人能够认真查看整套书面记录,包括程序问题以及其中明显的不一致之处。

📥 下载音频(.m4a)

我起诉 Bella——2023 年 11 月 14 日

这段录音记录了一次与我试图就前房东(此处称为“Bella”)提出诈骗相关申诉有关的法院出庭。

在那个阶段,我没有律师代理,也是在缺乏有效语言支持的情况下应对程序要求。我的目的很直接:希望法院审查这场纠纷的基础事实,包括导致合同被发布的背景,以及据称曾被报告过的威胁。

从录音中可以听到,整个过程逐渐转向表格、技术要求和程序门槛,而不是对核心问题本身进行评估。对我而言,这是其中一个让我开始很难相信这个体系是为了让一名外国申诉人能够在平等基础上获得有效救济而设计的时刻。

这并不是一段“戏剧性”的录音——但它是书面与音频证据链中的一部分,显示出这场纠纷如何随着时间不断扩大,而真正的解决始终遥不可及。

📥 下载音频(.m4a)

来自台湾移民署的电话——2023 年 11 月 23 日

这段录音记录了 2023 年 11 月 23 日来自台湾移民机关的一通电话。

当移民机关联系一名外国居民时,天然就带有明显压力。在这通电话里,我的担忧非常清楚:我已在台湾合法居住多年,完成登记,并经营正当业务。但电话的语气与内容,却进一步强化了我的感受——我被当成了一份案件档案,而不是一个正面临不断升级法律风险的人。

从背景上看,这段录音之所以重要,是因为移民联系与刑事程序可能会以某种方式相互交织,从而使非公民处于更脆弱的位置——尤其是在语言障碍与程序复杂性本就存在的情况下。

📥 下载音频(.m4a)

2024 年 3 月 27 日——庭期(和解讨论)

这段录音(约 17 分钟)记录了一次庭审,法院再次提出和解。

现场有翻译,整体语气在程序上也显得礼貌。然而,其实质内容凸显出一个反复出现的问题:当一方的立场并不是妥协,而是“全有或全无”的要求时,所谓和解根本不是有意义的选项。

这段录音的价值,在于它清楚展示了程序是如何一再回到“和解”这个方向,却始终无法解决根本僵局。

📥 下载音频(.m4a)

2024 年 4 月 8 日——法院来电与“协商”问题

这段录音记录了 2024 年 4 月 8 日一位法院书记官的来电,转达法官再次要求我与房东“协商”。

在电话中,我说明协商已多次失败,而且房东提出的要求在现实中根本无力负担。此通电话也反映出我经常经历的一种程序混乱:多个庭期安排得非常接近,但每一次庭审究竟是为了什么,相关说明对我来说都并不清楚。

这之所以重要,是因为当一名被告无法可靠地理解时间安排、程序目的或当前程序状态——尤其是在跨语言障碍的情况下——他便极难真正有效地参与其中。

📥 下载音频(.m4a)

法院语音留言——2024 年 4 月 17 日

这是一段很短的录音(刚超过两分钟),是 2024 年 4 月 17 日台中高等法院打来的语音留言。

来电者询问我是否愿意与对方进行调解。从背景上看,这段留言显示出,即使在长期冲突以及多次未能达成任何可行条件之后,整个系统仍持续推动调解。

对读者而言,这段语音留言是一份虽小却颇具说明性的材料:礼貌的措辞与程序上的例行公事,覆盖着一场已经升级为严重个人与法律后果的纠纷。

📥 下载音频(.m4a)

法院现场录音——2024 年 4 月 17 日

这段录音(约 1 小时 55 分钟)记录了一整天漫长的法院庭审过程。

其中相当大一部分又回到了同样的核心框架:聚焦在我发布合同这件事本身,而不是我为何这样做、相关纠纷背景,或我一再提出的证据与程序问题。

我在录音中描述了维修尝试如何让状况变得更糟,也说明了为什么在一个以书面中文主导案卷的体系里,记录文件成了我唯一可靠的事实说明方式。

即便这场庭审听起来节奏缓慢,它仍是这起案件实际运作方式的档案记录之一——也正是它让我最终无法再相信自己是在平等条件下获得公平审查。

📥 下载音频(.m4a)

2024 年 5 月 16 日——庭期(该录音的背景说明)

这段录音对应我在 2024 年 5 月 16 日的一次出庭——这是多起围绕同一基础指控展开的程序之一。

在这段录音及其周边记录中,我一再提出程序性问题:与同一次短暂发布行为相关的事项,如何在不同轨道上被分别推进;语言障碍如何实质影响我作出回应的能力;以及有利于我的背景事实并未以一种连贯、公平的方式被认真权衡。

我也说明了某些关键细节——包括与那通威胁电话有关之人的身份——是如何以中文形式被记载,而我在当时根本无法有意义地核实。这正是语言可及性如何在现实中(而非理论上)影响正当程序的最清楚例子之一。

也值得一提的是,现场有一位法院口译员,她在整个过程中表现得专业且友善。即使整体程序让人觉得失灵,个体依然可以表现出正直。

📥 下载音频(.m4a)

法庭中——2024 年 6 月 18 日

这段录音来自我在 2024 年 6 月 18 日的一次出庭。

再一次,整个程序似乎把焦点收窄到“发布合同”这件事本身,而不是进行完整且有背景脉络的评估——包括我认为十分重要的证人证词,以及我当时采取行动时的心理状态。

这段录音也展现了个体专业表现(包括口译支持)与更大范围程序决策模式之间的反差;在我看来,后者削弱了公平性。

对观察者而言,这场庭审之所以重要,并不在于某个单一“瞬间”,而在于它再次复制了多年里不断发生的模式:狭窄指控的重复,以及背景证据持续被弱化。

📥 下载音频(.m4a)

与黄先生的通话——2024 年 10 月 22 日

这段录音与我在收到一份与最高法院有关的通知后,和黄先生进行的一通电话有关;该通知在送达方式上本身就引发了关于正式性与通讯安全的基本疑问。

在这通电话及其相关背景中,关键问题不只是文书本身——而是更大的担忧:整个程序已变得僵化、过度形式主义,并与外国被告所承受的现实后果脱节。

我之所以将这段录音纳入,是因为它反映了我一再遇到的情况:一种默认你精通语言、默认你具备法律理解能力、默认你能够平等获得救济的沟通方式——而这些假设,与许多外国人在台湾法律体系中的真实经历并不相符。

📥 下载音频(.m4a)

2025 年 2 月 19 日——移民来电

这段录音录制于 2025 年 2 月 19 日晚上。当时我人在加拿大新不伦瑞克省,意外接到来自台湾移民机关的电话。

在通话中,承办人员谈到了与社区劳动及监禁相关的选项。我解释了为什么在我的处境下,这些选项并不能算作真正有意义的替代方案:考虑到基础纠纷、程序经过,以及已经加诸于我身上的严重后果,它们并不现实。

这之所以重要,是因为它显示出移民机关的联系可以跨越国境继续追随一名被告——而即便后来有新的正式函件承认了某些减轻因素,整个体系的预期仍可能丝毫不变。

这是案卷中的又一块拼图,说明了为什么我认为此案结果与基础行为并不相称——也说明了为什么我持续请求独立审查与纠正。

📥 下载音频(.m4a)

页脚动画
返回博客

3 条评论

ROSS CLINE – PERSONA NON GRATTA IN TAIWAN
You need to stop and face reality, because right now you are completely detached from how the system you are attacking actually works.
WHAT YOU ARE DEMANDING IS NOT JUST UNREALISTIC — IT IS FUNDAMENTALLY IMPOSSIBLE.
You are asking for:
1. a personal apology from the President, a public apology from the judiciary for the “fuck up,”
2. 2 MILLION NTD (2,000,000 NTD) IN COMPENSATION,
3. criminal punishment for your former landlord,
4. and a reversal of your situation outside the legal system.
NONE OF THESE DEMANDS HAVE ANY LEGAL BASIS. NONE OF THEM ARE WITHIN THE POWER OF THE PEOPLE YOU ARE ADDRESSING.
The President cannot intervene in court decisions. The President cannot overturn your case. The President cannot order compensation. The President cannot issue apologies on behalf of judges. These are basic principles of any democratic system.
THE FACT THAT YOU CONTINUE TO INSIST ON THIS SHOWS THAT YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE SYSTEM YOU ARE CRITICIZING.
Your demand for a judicial apology is equally disconnected from reality.
COURTS DO NOT APOLOGIZE. EVER.
If there is an error, it is addressed through appeals or legal review — not public admissions of wrongdoing because someone demands it.
Your demand for 2 MILLION NTD (2,000,000 NTD) is not compensation — it is a number you chose.
PERSONAL FRUSTRATION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL ENTITLEMENT.
Now address the central issue you continue to avoid:
YOU WERE CHARGED AND CONVICTED BECAUSE YOU PUBLISHED YOUR RENTAL CONTRACT ONLINE, INCLUDING YOUR LANDLORD’S PERSONAL INFORMATION. THAT IS NOT A MINOR DETAIL. THAT IS THE ENTIRE BASIS OF THE CASE.
Under Taiwan’s personal data protection laws, publicly exposing another individual’s private information is a serious offense.
THE LAW DOES NOT PERMIT YOU TO HANDLE DISPUTES BY PUBLISHING SOMEONE ELSE’S PERSONAL DATA ONLINE.
You have acknowledged that you engaged in the conduct that led to your conviction.
THIS IS NOT A WRONGFUL CONVICTION. THIS IS A LAWFUL CONSEQUENCE OF A CRIME YOU DO NOT DISPUTE.
Your characterization of your situation as “exile” is inaccurate.
YOU WERE NOT EXILED. YOU WERE SENTENCED UNDER THE LAW AND CHOSE TO LEAVE.
Your allegations of racism are also contradicted by your own documented behavior.
YOU HAVE USED RACIST LANGUAGE, MADE DEGRADING REMARKS, DIRECTED HOMOPHOBIC COMMENTS, AND PUBLICLY MOCKED INDIVIDUALS IN A DEHUMANIZING WAY. THESE COMMENTS ARE DOCUMENTED IN YOUR RECORDINGS AND VIDEOS PUBLISHED ON YOUR WEBSITE (ILEARN.TW).
THESE EXPLOSIVE COMMENTS INCLUDES:
1. “I WORKED LIKE A NIGGER FOR 15 YEARS”
2. “SHIT-HOLE COUNTRY”
3. “THIRLD WORLD BANANA REPUBLIC SHITHOLE”
4. “SOMEONE WITH A TURBAN IN HIS HEAD FROM SOME SHITHOLE COUNTRY IS DRIVING A TAXI FOR SHITHOLE MONEY”
5. “THEY ARE ALL GAYS AND THAT’S HOW THEY LEARNED THEIR ENGLISH, THEY LEARN ENGLISH IN A GAY SAUNA AT TAIPEI, HI I’M A BOTTOM, FIRST THING THEY LEARNED TO SAY, TOTAL BOTTOM, HUNGRY BOTTOM”
You have also directed abusive language toward government personnel, including officials of the National Immigration Agency.
THIS BEHAVIOR DESTROYS YOUR CREDIBILITY.
Additionally, your public statements — including extreme claims suggesting geopolitical consequences involving Canada and Taiwan — further undermine the seriousness of your position.
It must also be clearly stated that the individuals involved in this matter — including Bella, Paul, and Bella’s husband — are exceptional, honest, outstanding, remarkable, extraordinary, distinguished, superior, elite, unparalleled Taiwanese individuals who were directly affected by your actions, and now they’re just VICTIMS of your BLATANT CRIMES.
THEY ARE NOT PERPETRATORS. THEY ARE THE PARTIES WHOSE PERSONAL DATA YOU EXPOSED. THEY ARE THE VICTIMS OF YOUR CRIMINAL CONDUCT. This is the reason the legal system treats such conduct seriously. THE HARM IS REAL, AND IT AFFECTS REAL PEOPLE.
You are not being taken seriously because your claims are unsupported.
YOU ARE NOT BEING IGNORED BECAUSE YOUR CASE IS COMPLEX. YOU ARE BEING IGNORED BECAUSE WHAT YOU ARE ASKING FOR DOES NOT EXIST WITHIN THE LEGAL SYSTEM.
Escalating this matter through websites, social media, public accusations, and appeals to international attention does not strengthen your position.
IT ONLY CONFIRMS THAT YOU ARE NOT ENGAGING IN A CREDIBLE OR LAWFUL WAY. At this point, you are not presenting a legal argument.
YOU ARE REPEATING DEMANDS THAT CANNOT BE FULFILLED. Nothing you are asking for will occur. NOT THE PRESIDENTIAL APOLOGY. NOT THE JUDICIAL APOLOGY. NOT THE 2 MILLION NTD (2,000,000 NTD) NOT THE INTERVENTION. NOT THE PUNISHMENT YOU ARE TRYING TO ASSIGN TO OTHERS.
If you continue on this path, the outcome will remain unchanged.
YOU WILL CONTINUE TO ESCALATE, AND YOU WILL CONTINUE TO RECEIVE NO RESPONSE.
If you intend to pursue any realistic resolution, you must stop this approach and engage through proper legal mechanisms.
OTHERWISE, YOU ARE CHOOSING TO REMAIN IN A POSITION THAT HAS NO POSSIBILITY OF PRODUCING THE OUTCOME YOU ARE DEMANDING.
Please understand that you do not belong in Taiwan. You are a criminal with a criminal record. You refused to pay a fine, go to jail, or complete community service. You are not welcome here anymore. You are also a very poor example of an English teacher in Taiwan—unprofessional, irresponsible, and promoting conspiracy theories and irrational ideas. No child should ever be exposed to someone like you. You and your boyfriend, Patrick, who is a Taiwanese citizen, are a shameful example. As a Taiwanese citizen, he has supported you in all this craziness, and he should be held accountable (revoke his Taiwanese citizenship) for supporting someone like you.
STAY IN CANADA, WHERE YOU BELONG, AND NEVER COME BACK TO TAIWAN.

URGENT: FORMAL NOTICE REGARDING YOUR CLAIMS AND DEMANDS

ROSS CLINE – PERSONA NON GRATTA IN TAIWAN You need to stop and face reality, because right now you are completely detached from how the system you are attacking actually works. WHAT YOU ARE DEMANDING IS NOT JUST UNREALISTIC — IT IS FUNDAMENTALLY IMPOSSIBLE. You are asking for: a personal apology from the President, a public apology from the judiciary for the “fuck up,” 2 MILLION NTD (2,000,000 NTD) IN COMPENSATION, criminal punishment for your former landlord, and a reversal of your situation outside the legal system. NONE OF THESE DEMANDS HAVE ANY LEGAL BASIS. NONE OF THEM ARE WITHIN THE POWER OF THE PEOPLE YOU ARE ADDRESSING. The President cannot intervene in court decisions. The President cannot overturn your case. The President cannot order compensation. The President cannot issue apologies on behalf of judges. These are basic principles of any democratic system. THE FACT THAT YOU CONTINUE TO INSIST ON THIS SHOWS THAT YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE SYSTEM YOU ARE CRITICIZING. Your demand for a judicial apology is equally disconnected from reality. COURTS DO NOT APOLOGIZE. EVER. If there is an error, it is addressed through appeals or legal review — not public admissions of wrongdoing because someone demands it. Your demand for 2 MILLION NTD (2,000,000 NTD) is not compensation — it is a number you chose. PERSONAL FRUSTRATION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL ENTITLEMENT. Now address the central issue you continue to avoid: YOU WERE CHARGED AND CONVICTED BECAUSE YOU PUBLISHED YOUR RENTAL CONTRACT ONLINE, INCLUDING YOUR LANDLORD’S PERSONAL INFORMATION. THAT IS NOT A MINOR DETAIL. THAT IS THE ENTIRE BASIS OF THE CASE. Under Taiwan’s personal data protection laws, publicly exposing another individual’s private information is a serious offense. THE LAW DOES NOT PERMIT YOU TO HANDLE DISPUTES BY PUBLISHING SOMEONE ELSE’S PERSONAL DATA ONLINE. You have acknowledged that you engaged in the conduct that led to your conviction. THIS IS NOT A WRONGFUL CONVICTION. THIS IS A LAWFUL CONSEQUENCE OF A CRIME YOU DO NOT DISPUTE. Your characterization of your situation as “exile” is inaccurate. YOU WERE NOT EXILED. YOU WERE SENTENCED UNDER THE LAW AND CHOSE TO LEAVE. Your allegations of racism are also contradicted by your own documented behavior. YOU HAVE USED RACIST LANGUAGE, MADE DEGRADING REMARKS, DIRECTED HOMOPHOBIC COMMENTS, AND PUBLICLY MOCKED INDIVIDUALS IN A DEHUMANIZING WAY. THESE COMMENTS ARE DOCUMENTED IN YOUR RECORDINGS AND VIDEOS PUBLISHED ON YOUR WEBSITE (ILEARN.TW). THIS EXPLOSIVE COMMENTS INCLUDES: “I WORK LIKE A NIGGER FOR 15 YEARS” “SHIT-HOLE COUNTRY” “THIRLD WORLD BANANA REPUBLIC SHITHOLE” “SOMEONE WITH A TURBAN IN HIS HEAD FROM SOME SHITHOLE COUNTRY IS DRIVING A TAXI FOR SHITHOLE MONEY” “THEY ARE ALL GAYS AND THAT’S HOW THEY LEARNED THEIR ENGLISH, THEY LEARN ENGLISH IN A GAY SAUNA AT TAIPEI, HI I’M A BOTTOM, FIRST THING THEY LEARNED TO SAY, TOTAL BOTTOM, HUNGRY BOTTOM” You have also directed abusive language toward government personnel, including officials of the National Immigration Agency. THIS BEHAVIOR DESTROYS YOUR CREDIBILITY. Additionally, your public statements — including extreme claims suggesting geopolitical consequences involving Canada and Taiwan — further undermine the seriousness of your position. It must also be clearly stated that the individuals involved in this matter — including Bella, Paul, and Bella’s husband — are exceptional, honest, outstanding, remarkable, extraordinary, distinguished, superior, elite, unparalleled Taiwanese individuals who were directly affected by your actions, and now they’re just VICTIMS of your BLATANT CRIMES. THEY ARE NOT PERPETRATORS. THEY ARE THE PARTIES WHOSE PERSONAL DATA YOU EXPOSED. THEY ARE THE VICTIMS OF YOUR CRIMINAL CONDUCT. This is the reason the legal system treats such conduct seriously. THE HARM IS REAL, AND IT AFFECTS REAL PEOPLE. You are not being taken seriously because your claims are unsupported. YOU ARE NOT BEING IGNORED BECAUSE YOUR CASE IS COMPLEX. YOU ARE BEING IGNORED BECAUSE WHAT YOU ARE ASKING FOR DOES NOT EXIST WITHIN THE LEGAL SYSTEM. Escalating this matter through websites, social media, public accusations, and appeals to international attention does not strengthen your position. IT ONLY CONFIRMS THAT YOU ARE NOT ENGAGING IN A CREDIBLE OR LAWFUL WAY. At this point, you are not presenting a legal argument. YOU ARE REPEATING DEMANDS THAT CANNOT BE FULFILLED. Nothing you are asking for will occur. NOT THE PRESIDENTIAL APOLOGY. NOT THE JUDICIAL APOLOGY. NOT THE 2 MILLION NTD (2,000,000 NTD) NOT THE INTERVENTION. NOT THE PUNISHMENT YOU ARE TRYING TO ASSIGN TO OTHERS. If you continue on this path, the outcome will remain unchanged. YOU WILL CONTINUE TO ESCALATE, AND YOU WILL CONTINUE TO RECEIVE NO RESPONSE. If you intend to pursue any realistic resolution, you must stop this approach and engage through proper legal mechanisms. OTHERWISE, YOU ARE CHOOSING TO REMAIN IN A POSITION THAT HAS NO POSSIBILITY OF PRODUCING THE OUTCOME YOU ARE DEMANDING. Please understand that you do not belong in Taiwan. You are a criminal with a criminal record. You refused to pay a fine, go to jail, or complete community service. You are not welcome here anymore. You are also a very poor example of an English teacher in Taiwan—unprofessional, irresponsible, and promoting conspiracy theories and irrational ideas. No child should ever be exposed to someone like you. You and your boyfriend, Patrick, who is a Taiwanese citizen, are a shameful example. As a Taiwanese citizen, he has supported you in all this craziness, and he should be held accountable (revoke his Taiwanese citizenship) for supporting someone like you. STAY IN CANADA, WHERE YOU BELONG, AND NEVER COME BACK TO TAIWAN.

URGENT: FORMAL NOTICE REGARDING YOUR CLAIMS AND DEMANDS

You need to understand, very clearly, where you actually stand — because right now you are operating completely outside of reality.

What you are asking for is not just unlikely, it is fundamentally impossible within the legal and political system you are dealing with.

You are demanding:
- a personal apology from the President,
- a public apology from the judiciary,
- and 2 million NTD in compensation.

None of these are things you are entitled to, and none of these are things the President has the power to grant.

The President of Taiwan cannot override courts, cannot reopen your case, cannot order compensation, and cannot issue apologies on behalf of the judiciary. That would violate the most basic principle of a democratic system: separation of powers. The fact that you keep directing your demands at the President shows a complete misunderstanding of how the system actually works.

Your demand for a “judicial apology for the fuck up” is equally unrealistic. Courts do not apologize for decisions. If there is an error, it is addressed through appeals and legal review — not public apologies. That is how every rule-of-law system functions.

Your request for 2 million NTD as an “incentive” or compensation is not grounded in any legal basis. Compensation is only awarded when a court or legal process determines that a wrongful conviction or state liability exists. You have not demonstrated that. You are simply assigning a number to your personal frustration and calling it fair. That is not how compensation works.

You also admit that you committed the act that led to the charge. That means this is not a case of innocence — it is a case of disagreement with the outcome. You are trying to turn a legal consequence into a human-rights violation without establishing that the law was applied incorrectly.

You were not exiled. You were sentenced under the law and chose to leave rather than face the consequences. Reframing that decision as “exile” does not change reality — it only weakens your credibility.

At this point, your approach is not helping you. Public campaigns, demands for apologies, and attempts to pressure political figures will not produce the outcome you want. They will only make your claims less credible and ensure that no serious authority engages with you.

Right now, you are not pursuing a solution. You are escalating a situation in a way that guarantees it cannot be resolved on your terms.

If you want any chance of moving forward, you need to stop this entirely and return to realistic legal channels. Otherwise, nothing will change — no matter how many letters you send, how much attention you try to generate, or how strongly you believe you are right.

寫信給總統電⼦信箱

发表评论

Registrations and Appointments