Press & Interviews — Ross Cline

Press & Interviews

Ross Cline 柯受恩

For podcast hosts, journalists, researchers, and legislators. Everything on this page can be verified against the documents linked at the bottom.

Ross Cline, Phnom Penh, 2026

Ninety seconds, recorded in Phnom Penh, September 2026.

What I say in the video

My name is Ross Cline. In 2019, during a dispute with my landlord in Taiwan, I posted my own signed lease online for two days. I do not dispute that. Taiwan enforces its privacy law criminally, and I was sentenced to six months in prison. I cannot read Chinese. Taiwan's own law required a court interpreter for me. Across four years, no interpreter was ever appointed and no document was translated. Taiwan's Supreme Prosecutors Office confirmed both facts in writing in December 2025, and in the same letter refused to reopen the case. My summons literally says: if you do not read Chinese, bring your own translator. My only interpreter was a chatbot. I now live in Phnom Penh, because going home means prison. I am not asking you to say a court was wrong. I am asking for thirty minutes on your show to walk through the documents. Everything is at rosscline.com/pages/press.

Correction, 20 September 2026. The video was recorded before I had checked the court file against my own memory. Two things in it are imprecise and the written sections below are the current, checked version: the courts' finding is 2021, not 2019; and the interpreter failure was not total. Some hearings were held with no interpreter at all, at others the person sworn as interpreter conveyed, by my account, a fraction of what was said, and no document was ever translated. The Supreme Prosecutors Office did not dispute this; "confirmed" overstates its letter.

4years of proceedings
1hearing on the court's own record held after I was asked, in Chinese, whether I understood Chinese
0documents translated
6months in prison, final at the Supreme Court

Who I am

I'm Ross Cline (柯受恩), a Canadian from Deer Island, New Brunswick. For fifteen years I ran an English school in Taichung, Taiwan, and taught more than a thousand Taiwanese children. I loved the place enough to begin naturalization. I now live in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, because going home to Taiwan means prison.

The story in sixty seconds

The dispute began with a shop gate that fell in November 2020, which I had asked my landlord to repair; two Taiwanese television stations, TVBS and EBC, filmed it. The courts found that in 2021, during that dispute, I posted online documents containing her personal data, including our lease, and that some of the material stayed online for months; my own account is that the lease was up for about two days and that the witnesses I applied to call on that point were never summoned. Taiwan enforces its Personal Data Protection Act criminally: six months in prison, final at the Supreme Court in October 2024. I could not read the judgments and learned their findings only in September 2026. I am not asking anyone to retry the facts.

I cannot read Chinese. Taiwan's own law has required a court interpreter for defendants like me since 2020. No document in the proceedings was ever translated for me. Some hearings were held with no interpreter at all; the court's own file records an evening hearing that went ahead after the judge asked me, in Chinese, whether I understood Chinese. At others the person sworn as interpreter conveyed, by my account, a fraction of what was said. On 22 December 2025 the Supreme Prosecutors Office did not dispute any of this when it refused to reopen the case; it reasoned that legal-aid counsel's presence at first instance was enough. That counsel did not interpret, and I had no counsel on appeal. In April 2026, Taiwan's National Human Rights Commission reported that the failure is systemic, borne mainly by Southeast Asian migrant workers. My summons prints, in Chinese: "If you do not read Chinese, please bring your own translator." My only interpreter was AI chatbots.

Printed on my court summons

「如不識中文請自行偕同翻譯到場協助」

"If you do not read Chinese, please bring your own translator."

Why I did not simply pay and stay

People ask why I did not pay the fine and get on with my life in Taiwan. The record first. The six months could be served as community service or converted to a fine, which the summons of March 2025 put at NT$183,000. The community service collapsed because every instruction came in a language I could not read, and it was revoked in March 2025. Whether a prosecutor would still accept the fine after a revocation is at the prosecutor's discretion, and from abroad I cannot lodge the application myself. Paying would not have touched the conviction. Then my own answer. I was not willing to pay for, and so live under, a conviction for posting my own lease, reached in a process in which not one document was ever translated for me. Some have called that stubborn. I think of it as the one form of self-respect the situation left me.

Five things I can talk about

Posting your own contract can be a crime.How criminal data-privacy law works abroad, and why nobody warns you.
"Bring your own translator."What a mandatory interpreter right looks like when it fails, and who really bears it.
When the chatbot is your lawyer.Two AIs read one official letter in opposite ways, with prison at stake. I relied on the wrong one and corrected myself publicly.
Exile by paperwork.How a community-service sentence collapses when every instruction is in a language you cannot read, and how residency quietly decays while you wait.
What Canada does, and doesn't do,when a citizen is wronged by a friendly democracy: a closed consular file, two Parliaments, and the United Nations. Now documented in the Department's own 551-page file, released in full under the Privacy Act on 9 October 2026: what it says, in its own words.

What is documented

Taichung District Court 111訴607 → Taichung High Court 112上訴3114 → Supreme Court 113台上4256 (final 16 October 2024). Supreme Prosecutors Office letter 台信114非1792字第11499189551號 (22 December 2025): the absence of interpretation and translation left undisputed; counsel's presence at first instance held sufficient; extraordinary appeal refused. First-instance file (一審卷 pp. 51–52): the hearing of 20 February 2023 held with no interpreter after the exchange 「因現在無法聯繫通譯到場,是否聽得懂中文,是否同意現在開庭?」/「我聽得懂一點中文,同意現在開庭。」 National Human Rights Commission findings reported 1 April 2026. UN Special Procedures submission filed 23 August 2026 (ref qb3rpyoa). Global Affairs Canada closed the consular file 27 March 2026; the complete file (551 pages, no exemptions) was released under the Privacy Act on 9 October 2026 and is quoted, with page numbers, at rosscline.com/blogs/scam/canada-consular-file-551-pages. Every document is public and indexed at iLearn.tw/newsbrief.

What I will not claim on your show

I am not asking anyone to retry the facts; where the courts' findings and my own account differ, on how long the lease was online and on the witnesses never summoned, I say so. I do not accuse any judge, prosecutor, or official of corruption, and I will not ask you to say a court was wrong. I do not present anything I cannot document. Legal-aid counsel was present at first instance but did not interpret; I say so. In 2025 I publicly relied on an AI mistranslation of one official letter and publicly corrected the record when the Control Yuan clarified it in writing. I will discuss that on air.

Formats and logistics

Video or audio, any platform, any hour (Phnom Penh, UTC+7). Fluent English; conversational Mandarin, and I can arrange a Mandarin interpreter for Chinese-language shows. Documents can be shared on screen. No fee sought, no approval over questions requested.

Book an interview →

Book directly: rosscline.com/pages/calendar
Email: rosscline@gmail.com
Phone / WhatsApp: +1 (506) 321-8659

Where the story has appeared

JURIST published my commentary on 29 September 2026: “When Court Interpretation Failed in Taiwan, I Turned to a Chatbot”. Magdalene (Indonesia) published my op-ed for Indonesian workers in Taiwan and their families on 8 October 2026: “Bring Your Own Translator? What Taiwan’s Law Actually Promises Indonesian Workers”. Also accepted: The NAJIT Observer, the blog of the U.S. National Association of Judiciary Interpreters and Translators (in editing); Humanising Language Teaching (Pilgrims; scheduled for 2027); Escape Artist (forthcoming). A feature for The ATA Chronicle, written to a scope agreed with its editor, was delivered on 2 October 2026 and is under review; an essay for MultiLingual magazine, delivered on 7 October 2026, is under review. The case is before members of the Standing Senate Committee on Human Rights of Canada and the House of Commons Subcommittee on International Human Rights, and an e-petition to the House of Commons, sponsored by my MP, has gathered its five supporters and is with him for authorization.

On 7 October 2026 the record was the case example at the Asia Fair Trial Practices Roundtable convened by BABSEACLE and the Centre for Law and Transformative Change; the organisers circulated my case-study material as the session's reading and I spoke to it. An open letter to Taiwan's Judicial Yuan from scholars of interpreting, forensic linguistics and criminal justice — asking for three things: a published count of Article 99 interpreter appointments, a fixed field for interpreter presence in every hearing record and judgment, and the quality check the National Human Rights Commission recommended in March 2026 — is being convened for delivery on 20 October 2026. Signatories so far: 4, from three countries, and one Taiwanese human-rights association has agreed to endorse it (updated 14 October 2026). Names and institutions will be published after delivery, with each signatory's consent.

Downloads

One-page guest sheet (PDF/Word): available on request by email until it is posted here. Full document index: iLearn.tw/newsbrief. The story in my own words: rosscline.com/blogs/scam.